AP World. Melissa Longnecker. Eric Beckman. Evan Liddle. Share Bookmark. This is the type of paragraph that can open a DBQ. But, I recommend outlining how you will use the documents as evidence before writing your thesis. As you read the document-based question, I recommend taking brief notes on the prompt and each document. Evaluate the extent to which rulers of early modern empires, c.
From to , the rulers of empires came up with several methods conssolidating power. This paved the way for future rulers to hold power while ensuring that their empire would thrive. Rulers of empires between and relied heavily traditional methods such as an trade and an established currency system to consolidate their power.
The Qing Dynasty was also spreading Europe is trying to expand and build maritime empires, and trade routes are connecting the Americas to Europe. Rulers of early modern empires circa very effectively used traditional methods to consolidate power, for example, Suleiman I, a former ruler of the Ottoman Empire conquers Tripoli in North Africa and starts a period of reform called the Devishrime; in the Safavid Empire, Shah Abbas comes to power in and tries to modernize the empire through encouraging trade and building bureaucracy, and in the Mughal Empire, Akbar establishes Divine Faith in attempts to normalize religious tolerance.
Before the time period of ,the Mongols contributed to the downfall of the Abbasid caliphate as they invaded it and weakened its political influence. This caused the development of network exchanges like the silk road and Indian ocean trade routes. As a result,religions like Christianity and Islam spread and diffused but it is not always tolerated. Rulers of early modern empires used traditional methods to consolidate power like in the ottoman empire, the sultan Suleiman ,was obeyed by janissaries so this is how he got a bigger military and smarter government,in the safavid empire the ruler attempts to build a bureaucracy and modernize.
Although the potency of empires and dynasties apart of the early modern era was composed through more-novelty methods such as sabotage and social hierarchy change, because consolidation was implemented through pervasive conversions such as how the Ottomans used the Hagia Sophia and the use of trade such as the Portuguese assimilating dominance across the trading route of the Indian Ocean methodization for imperialism between and tends to take on more traditional forms, therefore religious legitimization and commerce were attractive for gaining power to empire rulers.
The differentiation of methods was promoted during the postclassical era This is shown in how the Song Dynasty brought out power through advancement in multiple fields; through the allowance of varying methods power was well achieved, almost acting as a model for future imperial powerholders. In the years leading up to , The Mongols gained power all over Afro-Eurasia through their harsh warfare lead by Genghis Khan.
The Mongols controlled many of the trade routes such as the Silk Roads. When they eventually fell they split up into 4 Khanates spread out over Afro-Eurasia. With these new empires forming, emperors needed to have complete power over these territories. Prior to , vast trade networks such as the Silk Roads and the Indian Ocean networks arose, increasing interregional connection across Afro-Eurasia.
This increase in connection between cultures and peoples and the use of newer technologies such as gunpowder facilitated the growth of large empires throughout the entirety of Afro-Eurasia. After the rulers of these empires had conquered enough territory, they had to find ways to solidify, or consolidate, their power over these large, culturally diverse areas of land.
Although some empires used traditional religious ideals to consolidate their power, most empires turned to radical changes in the way in which trade was conducted and the unprecedented strengthening of military assets in order to accomplish this goal. Previously, in , empires like the Abbasid Empire and Mongol empire expanded and consolidated power through developments in technology like caravans and saddles, and also through military conquests like the implementation of the Mongolian Khanates.
These approaches characterized how empires consolidated power during the postclassical era. Starting in rulers of early modern empires shifted to a more traditional approach to consolidating their power through the use of religious tolerance and military conquest.
Specifically, the gunpowder empires used both religious worship and militaristic conquering to expand consolidate and legitimize. Also, empires in a East Asia like the powerful Ming Dynasty expanded vastly through the conquering of lands in Mongolia and Central Asia.
Lastly empires in Europe consolidated power through the development on new monarchies that centralized power through controlling taxes, army and religion. Through conquest, religious tolerance and centralized government, rules in the modern era were able to successfully consolidate power.
In the late 14th century the Ottoman Empire developed a system called devshirme that staffed their military and government. This system expanded in the 15th and 16th centuries and continued to build up the Ottoman military. Christian boys were recruited by force to serve in the Ottoman government. The thesis or claim must be based on historical facts and must establish a line of reasoning.
Context: Provide context relevant to the prompt by describing a broader historical development or process. Evidence: Use at least six of the provided documents to support an argument in response to the prompt. Additional Evidence: Use a historical example not found in the documents as evidence relevant to an argument about the prompt.
Sourcing: Explain how the context or situation of at least three documents is relevant to an argument. Complex Understanding: Demonstrate a nuanced understanding of an argument that responds to the prompt by using evidence to corroborate, qualify, or modify the argument.
During Step 2: Plan Your Response. During Step 3: Action! Write Your Response. During Step 4: Proofread.
It saves all key details for the body paragraphs, like encomiendas, Spanish silver, Puritans, Jamestown, etc, but includes what major points the rest of your essay will discuss. The third thesis is obviously too much. Again, you can go with whatever format that works for you, but remember to explain the major points of your essay without making it too general or using important details for the body paragraphs. Revise your current thesis and post it as a reply to me.
Significant improvement, I would just add details to be more specific. In your thesis, you want to try to satisfy the reader so they know what to expect in the rest of your essay. All Rights Reserved. Here was an example thesis that I made for his first exam on the compare and contrast essay: Topic: Compare and contrast Egypt and Mesopotamia. My Thesis: Mesopotamia and Egypt are both parallel when relating to the objective of their rulers, but are distinguishable in the their religious believes throughout their societies.
My teacher commented: "The thesis is vague, it needs to be more specific. Here is his rubric for the thesis: Thesis out of 15 points Must get first 5 points to get other points: Valid, underlined the thesis in the essay, in the introduction paragraph. Also, please do give feedback over my terrible thesis… Thanks! Thank you!! This really helped with great examples and explanations. Would that be a good thesis?
Please enter a valid email address. People of different nationalities reacted differently to the Ottoman government depending on their religion. The following paragraph says a great deal about history, but it does not address the substance of the question. It would not receive credit because of its irrelevancy. Throughout history, people around the world have struggled with the issue of political power and freedom.
From the harbor of Boston during the first stages of the American Revolution to the plantations of Haiti during the struggle to end slavery, people have battled for power. Even in places like China with the Boxer Rebellion, people were responding against the issue of Westernization. Imperialism made the demand for change even more important, as European powers circled the globe and stretched their influences to the far reaches of the known world. In the Ottoman Empire too, people demanded change.
Now we turn to thesis statements that do work. These two sentences address both the religious and ethnic aspects of the question. They describe how these groups were viewed. The Ottoman government took the same position on religious diversity as it did on ethnic diversity. Minorities were servants of the Ottoman Turks, and religious diversity was allowed as long as Islam remained supreme. This statement answers the question in a different way but is equally successful.
Government officials in the Ottoman Empire sent out the message that all people in the empire were equal regardless of religion or ethnicity, yet the reality was that the Turks and their version of Islam were superior. To earn a stellar score, several indicators of excellence may be considered.
A high-scoring essay will likely:. Crafting a Solid Thesis Statement. Thesis Statements that DO Work. Going Beyond the Basic Requirements. Need Help?