Employers also use standardized tests to gauge the knowledge and skills of their employees in order to determine which of them is best suited for available positions. We have many sample essays you can read about this topic that are both informative and well written. You can use these standardized testing essays to generate ideas for your writing, as well as to develop a clear understanding of how to write a thesis statement and conclusion.
In third grade, my Virginia SOLs determined Standardized Testing 3 Pages. It is true that standardized testing is commonly used in most schools and other institutions of learning to compare the performance of students. This is a scenario where similar tests are administered to the students and the answers or responses given by the students are Cons of Standardized Testing The distribution of standardized tests within American classrooms has been implicated since the late s.
An Analysis of Standardized Testing In recent years, standardized testing has become the basis for learning standards. Lesson plans and school activities tend to be built around what will be on the standardized tests that year, leaving little room for teachers to come up with Remember Me. What is your profession? Student Teacher Writer Other. Username or Email. Academic Assignments Writing an Essay. Writing a Research Paper. Writing a Review. Writing Guides for Students Writing a Memoir 2.
Creative Writing Guides Writing a Song 3. Writing a Letter Writing an Evaluation Letter 3. Writing Essentials. Grammar Handbook. Reference Strong, Malena. Need Help? Ask an expert for FREE. Popular Questions Thesis statement and compare contrast essay asked by Admin What is a good thesis statement against euthanasia asked by Anonymous Gender stereotypes persuasive essay asked by Admin Which of the following would best work as the title of an explanatory essay?
Related Writing Guides Writing an evaluation essay is a great way to size up a particular object or idea. This type of critical writing sets precise criteria for evaluation, providing fair and solid supporting evidence so that readers can form their opinions about a subject. Login Username Password Remember Me. Register Username Email What is your profession? Forgotten Password? Register Lost your password? Back to Login.
We also need standardized tests to be outlawed because they give students anxiety. Standardized tests can give even the brightest of students the worst anxiety. Lastly, standardized tests need to be no more because they encourage teachers to cheat. As you may or may not know, teachers can be punished or rewarded depending on the test scores of the students they teach.
This persuades teachers to cheat the system. For instance, in January , a memo revealed that a total of teachers in Washington, D. This was shown by ABC News. Are we going to stand and let standardized tests persuade our educators to cheat the system of education? As you can now clearly see, we must end standardized tests. Students are currently spending less time learning and more time preparing for a test. In addition, standardized tests give test-takers anxiety.
Finally, teachers are tempted to cheat the system. To all readers, we need to put a stop to standardized tests. A petition could be the answer. With enough signatures and enough people to support this cause, standardized tests can be no more! Thoughtful essays, commentaries, and opinions on current events, ideas, and life in the Philadelphia region.
The policy grew out of necessity — very few students this spring have taken or will take the state test due to the COVID pandemic. Will this tweak in Pa. The standardized tests scores of chronically absent students will no longer count against teachers, schools, and the state. The SAT has undergone many, many changes over the years. Sign up for our weekly newsletter.
Speak Easy. Samantha McIver: Standardized tests are a fair assessment of student achievement Do you like standardized tests? Hey kids! Share this Facebook Twitter Email. Brought to you by Speak Easy Speak Easy Thoughtful essays, commentaries, and opinions on current events, ideas, and life in the Philadelphia region.
You may also like. Keystone Crossroads. Enter your Email here. Besides, the emotional state of students may be destabilized due to test-taking. The environment, fostering constant competition and even rivalry may create excessive stress and test-anxiety. A person who gets a low test score may become discouraged from pursuing further academic success. Perhaps one of the most serious drawbacks of using standardized testing is connected to discrimination. Holding all schools and students to the same national standards may infringe on the rights of students with disabilities, lower socio-economic statuses, those who learn English as a second language, students of different nationalities, and so on.
One can see that standardized testing is a universal method of evaluating those skills to which tests are targeted, which aim to reduce or even excludes bias, partiality, or the potential of human error. Standardized tests are meant to set a high standard and promote objectivity. However, this method is not perfect and involves a number of issues. Evaluating both sides of the argument allows for improvements to be made, while still encouraging students to strive for the highest academic achievement.
Strong, Malena. The Truth about Standardized Tests. New York: Big Tree Publishers, Remember Me. What is your profession? Student Teacher Writer Other. Username or Email. Academic Assignments Writing an Essay. Writing a Research Paper. Writing a Review.
Writing Guides for Students Writing a Memoir 2. Creative Writing Guides Writing a Song 3. Writing a Letter Writing an Evaluation Letter 3. Writing Essentials.
It first came about in , when it was used as a mean of assessing militant recruits. During this time it was able to test young men quickly and enter them into the military based on their level of intelligence. Standardized testing was important in testing the objectives Thesis statement: Standardized tests in the public school system have become biased and they are becoming costly to the school systems.
Introduction: According to Dr. Hoffman, it is the multiple-choice format that is to blame. A standardized test is a test that uses uniform procedures for administration and scoring The tests may vary by different schools and grades and it usually takes up a large portion of a student's total mark.
Although it is purposely designed to be a consistent and accurate tool. However, many questions the effectiveness of standardized testing. Standardized testing is an inaccurate assessment because it does not effectively judge the student's ability to learn or understand, it can not always A Bit of Change Here and There: An Improvement to the Traditional Standardized Testing There are a lot of students out there that may regret the amount of a certain type of education that has been given to them by their teachers.
A few of those students face living with human disabilities like autism and dyslexia. They feel this way, because they say that they are stressed out when trying to remember or take in any information that was given to them in the classroom. In fact, the amount of Standardized Testing Should Be Stopped Are you one of the many students who cram in hours upon hours of studying the night before an exam that has been stressing you out all week?
You wake up the next morning nervous and full of anxiety, just to take the same test as everyone else, under the same conditions as everyone else. Sounds fair right? Standardized tests were made to test the knowledge of a student over a particular course or subject. The ACT Regardless of where they went to school or what curriculum they followed, students are tested on the same material, which can be loosely grouped into knowledge domains and skill sets that encompass; natural sciences, social sciences, humanities, reading, speaking, writing, and mathematics.
Test anxiety has been shown to have a negative effect on performance Segool et al, Cost constraints are yet another consideration. The wholesale introduction of CSSS related curriculum and tests have resulted in an exponential cost in terms of supplies.
All previous textbooks and tests have become obsolete as most do not reflect the CSSS standards and methods. This places an additional strain on schools already struggling with funding. In addition CSSS was introduced to increase the level of competency of students and in particular, narrow the gap between white and minority student performance. This has been virtually unaffected. Increased emphasis on teaching all students the same has also resulted in some unforeseen consequences.
As a result of the increased work load we find a decline in the performance of teachers. In the previously referred to survey of teachers in the Northeastern United States a significant decline in perceived ability to teach was found. Decreased confidence in their ability to teach may lead to decreased performance. The resulting secondary effect of the teaching of the test and the pressure to have students perform on high-stakes tests resulting in less time spent on non core subjects has also had a negative effect.
The failure to take into account the cultural variables in poorer and inner city districts is also an issue. In that these schools rely more on grant funding and as such are more subject to the proposed minimum standards, CSSS receives even more emphasis that in other districts.
The loss of enrichment programs as music, art and even physical education further degrades the educational whole in these districts. Another effect of this emphasis on standardized methods and course content is the marginalizing of both high and low achievers. In particular, the opportunity to excel has been severely curtailed as high achievers, already at standard levels are used to help tutor the lower achieving students.
The elimination of gifted and talented programs, while forcing students to conform to methods and standards, may in actuality impede their development. Rather than excel, students are taught to aspire to a level of minimum competency. Inversely, low achievers are shut out as they need more help and will drag down the performance numbers.
Last of all, the billions spent to achieve even marginal gains on these standardized tests have resulted in less money being available for the day to day activities of the schools. Additionally the cost of wholesale replacement of text books, tests and other educational materials rendered irrelevant by the new CSSS standards and methods has resulted in very real financial difficulties to many districts.
The mandating of this curriculum without financial support commonly known as an unfunded mandate has resulted in a negative financial impact. There is a plethora of solutions to these problems. The first and most obvious would be to delay the implementation of CSSS curriculum. Rather than institute the overhaul of the entire educational system all at once, the changes could be phased in over time. This phasing in of changes would also relieve some of the apprehension, though obviously not all of it, regarding using the tests as evaluation tools, as there would be more time to prepare for the changeover.
There are several advantages to this. First of all, it would allow educators and institutions to familiarize themselves with the changes in methods and instructional standards. Next it would allow the cost to be spread out. Rather than having to replace all textbooks and materials at once, the amount could be budgeted and spread out.
Statistical data could be gathered on each section allowing changes and refinements to be made, improving and making changes to one section at a time. For example, if the methodology for multiplication is found to be unnecessarily complicated and time consuming or it results in a basic misunderstanding of math principles, it could be examined in depth and changed before the next phase in is introduced.
Targeted research could be conducted to improve methodology without having the variable of wholesale changes in other subjects skewing data. Inversely, the research and study of each component before the implementation of another may also result in problems. The research and change of each component may lead to the cessation of any sort of change as each change will have to be evaluated.
This may lead to a striving for perfection, a relative impossibility, before the next phase is implemented. This can lead to over analysis and a stagnation making any sort of educational change impossible. There still exists the inflexibility, suppression of creativity and loss of class time for non core subjects Berliner, Delaying implementation of CSSS may allow for the creation of strategies to address this. There are few if any additional drawbacks to a graduated implementation of changes but there are some.
Many however relate to the implementation of standardized high-stakes testing in general and are not specific to delayed implementation. Phasing in the changes at only the entry level such as kindergarten or first grade could prevent this negative result. Imposing high-stakes testing in any manner may have a negative effect on the younger students.
Younger children report symptoms of stress primarily associated with secondary and post secondary students. This increase in stress levels among students could be reduced further by deemphasizing the tests in the lower grade levels. They could simply be used as practice exams to familiarize children with the concept of high-stakes testing.
This could help them better understand testing methodology and reduce test anxiety. Additionally, familiarity with the format could alleviate many of the stress inducing elements. The reduction of class time for non targeted subjects as well as the aspect of teaching to the test could also be lessened. For example, high achievers could be allowed to opt out of the tests and format.
This could be based on them scoring an above average score on their first set of standardized tests. A result far enough above grade level would allow them to be in gifted and talented programs, free from CSSS structure and methods.
These classrooms would allow them to express their creativity and work at above CSSS standards. They would in essence be allowed to excel. As for lower achievers, the reduced class sizes, caused by the removal of the high achievers, would allow for more individualized attention and teaching by trained professionals rather than peers. Reducing the cost of CSSS by not requiring that school districts replace virtually all of their educational materials with approved curriculum from one supplier, Pearson, would make more funds available for all programs.
Eliminating the monopoly held by Pearson, in essence allowing them to set whatever price they want on materials, may also reduce costs. Allowing competition and certifying several companies rather than one could lead to competition thereby reducing price. As production and material costs rise due to inflation and other factors, the cost of curriculum will inevitably rise.
Delaying the purchase of this material may cause it to be more expensive in total. In the long run though, non core subjects may still suffer to allow for increased emphasis on the CSSS subjects, as they are the ones used for evaluation of educators and institutions. Conclusion While most would agree that our education system is flawed and in need of a major overhaul, it would seem, the majority of research and opinion find the CSSS severely flawed.
Standardized high-stakes testing has historically been shown to be lacking and the resulting test anxiety can in many cases reduce perceived competency Segool et al, In addition the increased emphasis on high-stakes testing has had a negative effect on the overall education of children, resulting in a reduction in class time in the case of non core subjects and a tendency to teach the test rather than the teach the course in core subjects.
The cost, estimated in the millions for an average district, comes at a time when our schools are struggling to find finances to operate. Class sizes have been increased as teachers have been laid off, non core subjects have been cut back or eliminated and quality of life programs such as the arts and sports in many cases have had to be slashed to accommodate reduced funding. The granting of a publishing monopoly, Pearson, is also suspect.
Pearson is the only company authorized to provide all CSSS material from texts to tests. In a quick side observation, the elimination of other publishers from the competition may result in the layoff of employees and wage manipulation by Pearson as they are the only game in town. But I digress.
The loss of enrichment and extracurricular offerings will adversely impact all students. Inner city and poor districts will feel the impact even more as they have far fewer community options to replace these offerings. Extracurriculars and arts programs have been shown to have a positive effect on learning Evans, This narrowing of the educational offerings, the resulting loss of educational diversification and increased concentration on passing standardized tests may lead to decreased performance and increased dropout rates.
Despite these and other drawbacks associated with CSSS, in light of the political climate and the threatened loss of state and federal aid to districts that do not comply with the CSSS mandate, it would seem that phasing in the standards at a slower rate is the only option. While it is imperfect and there are still far too many unanswered questions regarding the possible negative impact of high-stakes standardized tests, any real changes are at best years away.
Once again we experiment on our children without doing proper research and testing on methods designed by often unqualified individuals. The in depth study of this issue using peer reviewed articles has reinforced my opinions and what I have observed through the years. It also reinforced my belief that opinion pieces and questionable statistics are often used to drive public opinion.
As to what this project has done for me as far as learning about myself, I have to relate a bit of my background. My primary career is as a political consultant; a spin doctor if you will. They are half truths, statements taken out of context and outright fabrications. As such, much of my writing over the years has been sensationalistic and designed to evoke specific emotional responses. In relation to this project I had to research carefully. To clarify I always research thoroughly but some of the articles may be suspect.
I had to report clearly and concisely and focus on objectivity rather than trying to invoke a response. It has reconnected me with my academic roots and forced me to assume the role of objective researcher rather than speech writer. Cheating in the first, second and third degree: Educators' responses to high-stakes testing. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 18 Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct including amendments. Rational responses to high stakes testing: The case of curriculum narrowing and the harm that follows.
Cambridge Journal of Education, Vol. On the necessity of U-shaped learning. Topics in Cognitive Science, Vol. Core Standards Common core state standards initiative. Not by geeks alone. The Education Gadfly, Vol. Holding accountability accountable: A cost-benefit analysis of achievement test scores.